Is the q language simply syntactic sugar on top of k?
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 at 10:50PM
kdbfaq in Language, k, k language, k3, q language, q.k, syntactic sugar

Not really. There's been a meaningful expansion in the language to support tables and such. If you are curious, take a look at the code in $QHOME/q.k, it will help you understand what portions of q are implemented natively vs in k.

Article originally appeared on online book - kdb+/q faq - Kdb+ is the registered trademark of Kx Systems, Inc. (http://www.kdbfaq.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.